Assessing The PSMA-PET CT Predictive Ability of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer

Asad, Ismail; Tippins, N.; Tachibana, I.; Bahler, C.; Green, M.; Tann, M.

Work

Assessing The PSMA-PET CT Predictive Ability of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer

Public Deposited

MLA citation style (9th ed.)

Asad, Ismail , et al. Assessing The Psma-pet Ct Predictive Ability of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer. Indiana University School of Medicine.. 2023. marian.hykucommons.org/concern/generic_works/7dc87828-3c6d-46d3-9897-11a10b1fddea.

APA citation style (7th ed.)

A. Ismail, T. N, T. I, B. C, G. M, & T. M. (2023). Assessing The PSMA-PET CT Predictive Ability of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer. https://marian.hykucommons.org/concern/generic_works/7dc87828-3c6d-46d3-9897-11a10b1fddea

Chicago citation style (CMOS 17, author-date)

Asad, Ismail , Tippins, N., Tachibana, I., Bahler, C., Green, M., and Tann, M.. Assessing The Psma-Pet Ct Predictive Ability of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer. 2023. https://marian.hykucommons.org/concern/generic_works/7dc87828-3c6d-46d3-9897-11a10b1fddea.

Note: These citations are programmatically generated and may be incomplete.

Introduction and Objective:

Accurate prediction of extraprostatic extension (EPE) can guide surgical treatment planning and maximize quality of life outcomes. We sought to analyze clinical and PSMA- PET CT EPE predictability.

Methods: Retrospective review of pre-op PSMA-PET CT and clinical parameters compared with histopathologic EPE data.

Results: EPE prediction with PSMA-PET CT: sensitivity (0.78), specificity (0.79), PPV (0.61), and NPV (0.90). After including Gleason grade, the ROC curve demonstrated an AUC of 0.82.

Conclusion: PSMA-PET CT has strong EPE rule-out accuracy. Gleason grade did not substantially improve predictive capacity.

Creator

Contributors